Michael Jackson Estate Offers "Undeniable Facts" About HBO's 'Leaving Neverland'

Read what the King of Pop's representatives have to say about Dan Reed's film.

(AllHipHop News) Leaving Neverland premiered in March, but the documentary covering sexual abuse allegations against Michael Jackson is still being dissected. There was speculation that HBO pulled the two-part program from its network, but the cable channel denied those reports.

"Leaving Neverland is available on HBO through April 16th and then will continue to be available on HBO NOW and HBO GO," relayed the cable channel to Complex.

Dan Reed directed the documentary which features former child entertainers Wade Robson and James Safechuck, the two men that accused Jackson of molesting them as children. Despite some discrepancies in Safechuck's story, Reed stands by him, Robson, and the information presented in Leaving Neverland.

The Michael Jackson Estate is pushing back against all the Leaving Neverland accusations as well as the 13-time Grammy Award winner being tried in the court of public opinion. In a statement, the Estate presented what it calls "undeniable" and "relevant" facts about the situation.

The message reads:

First, an event unprecedented in the documentary film world occurred during the week of April 8, 2019, when the film’s director, Dan Reed, admitted that there are several discrepancies in the accusers’ story. James Safechuck, one of two accusers in the documentary claims that he was assaulted in an upstairs room at the Neverland Ranch train station from 1988 to 1992 but construction on Neverland’s train station did not start until late 1993 when the ranch received permits. The station was not even partially opened until 1994, which can be verified through state of California public records. Second, and equally disturbing, is that Mr. Reed admits that he did not fact check the stories that Safechuck and Wade Robson tell in the film, despite the fact that he devotes four hours to their tales and took more than two years to do the film. Mr. Reed uses selective editing and false claims in an attempt to discredit Mr. Jackson’s 2005 acquittal on child molestation charges. “Leaving Neverland” presents a series of uncorroborated tales and allegations against Michael Jackson by two accusers who are in the midst of appealing a lawsuit for millions of dollars against the late pop star’s estate. They did not mention this in the film, but it is an indisputable fact that both men have a financial stake in participating in the film, particularly if it influences their appeals. Mr. Robson and Mr. Safechuck had their lawsuits dismissed by the court twice for numerous provable inconsistencies in their sworn statements regarding alleged abuse by Mr. Jackson. The judge wrote in his judgment that “no rational fact-finder could possibly believe Robson’s statements.” Mr. Robson and Mr. Safechuck swore under oath that Mr. Jackson never abused them or harmed them in any way. For more than two decades, publically and privately, both accusers denied that Mr. Jackson abused them. Mr. Robson testified to this as an adult and under oath at Mr. Jackson’s 2005 trial -- a trial at which Mr. Jackson was found innocent of all charges by a jury of his peers in a court of law. He was Mr. Jackson’s first witness. Of significant note is that during the 2005 trial, it was disclosed that Mr. Jackson had been investigated for child molestation by the FBI and other California law enforcement agencies for 10 years, costing millions of dollars, and they found no evidence that he had abused any children. Another case in point is that Mr. Robson completely changes one of the critical moments of his narrative in the documentary from what he had said in his court papers as well as in a deposition taken just two months before he was filmed in “Leaving Neverland.” In in 2012, as he was attempting to write a book, he recalled so little about his interactions with Mr. Jackson that his mother had to fill in the blanks; her input did not include any references to the alleged abuse. However, in the film, unaided, Mr. Robson appears to have vivid recollections of specific events and alleged sex acts. Numerous relevant facts are omitted from the documentary that would help viewers better decide the credibility of the accusers, including: Michael Jackson was subjected to a lengthy and extensive investigation by law enforcement and the Federal Bureau of Investigation provided support to those investigations. The FBI website states, “Between 1993 and 1994, and separately between 2004 and 2005, Mr. Jackson was investigated by California law enforcement agencies for possible child molestation. He was acquitted of all such charges.” Mr. Jackson’s home and offices were raided unannounced multiple times and his medical records confiscated, which resulted in no evidence of the allegations. Mr. Robson met with Michael Jackson Estate lawyers in 2011to ask for a producer’s role in the Cirque du Soleil One production, based on Mr. Jackson’s music. Mr. Robson sued after he was denied the position. Also, he stated that he had no knowledge of the Michael Jackson Estate before March 4, 2013, even though he met with an Estate lawyer in 2011. Mr. Safechuck falsely claims he was pressured to testify at the 2005 trial but had already been eliminated as a witness by the judge who limited witnesses to Mr. Robson, Brett Barnes and Macauley Culkin. In the film, he states that he decided not to testify. Mr. Reed claims that Mr. Robson and Mr. Safechuck had not met until the Sundance Film Festival in January 2019 for legal reasons. However, in Mr. Robson’s deposition in 2016, he specifies that he had met Mr. Safechuck in 2014 while they were pursuing the cases against the Michael Jackson Estate. Mr. Robson is shown burning Michael Jackson memorabilia as the credits roll but Mr. Reed neglects to mention that Mr. Robson, as the press reported, auctioned his most valuable items in 2011 to satisfy a cash flow shortage.

Comments
No. 1-11
Sandra456
Sandra456

I hope these two guys go to jail for the lies and torment they have caused this dead mans family. They waited 10 years to trash a dead man, who cannot fend for himself. Just to sick for words. Now the family has to pick up the pieces. The truth will come out and all who discredited him i hope they will feel ashamed.

sep
sep

this is all about money.anyone with one brain cell can realize that these two men are not telling the truth.there are many many discrepancies in their mockumentary.train station is just a small one.they r out there for money and got support of hypocrite people like oprah.michael was innocent

Jake Pepper
Jake Pepper

Michael Jackson's twisted, evil deeds will assure that his legacy will always be tarnished by his filth. What a disgusting little puppet clown he was. Breaking news....Aaron Carter, who once admitted that he shared several lines of cocaine with an adult Michael Jackson, implies, he too was molested by the dancing skeleton.

NurseRach
NurseRach

I have been abused and spoken with many other abused and abusers. Im an RN. Using the victim's fuzzy details in an effort to discredit them shows lack of knowledge in the pathology that accompanies sexual abuse. The fact that they both initially testified under oath that he was innocent means nothing. They were child victims who were manipulated and groomed. Their actions are CLASSIC...and widely demonstrated in COUNTLESS cases. What got me is the things they focus on, their body language, their perspective... the emotional process, the emotional awareness and lack of. I completely believe that these men were abused. Michael was a sick, manipulative pedophile and if youre ignorant of this because you have never been abused, then consider yourself lucky. If you are blinded by admiration of the legend, then youre just sad and naive for being so gulluble. If you know he was guilty and are covering for him for money, you are in danger of the fire of hell.

Agrealtor$
Agrealtor$

There are several photos of Robson and Safechuck together as kids. For example, on the set of the Jam video. There are many other lies too. Comparing court transcripts to stories told on LN shows callous attempts to manipulate the judges and the public. Parents pushed their kids on him. Stage moms. When he felt used, he backed off. So eager to use his name to get ahead. Then and now. So what is your final answer? You didn't know you were abused, even as a grown adult? Or you were scared to tell because he said you would both go to jail? Again, you believed this well into adulthood? Or you didn't remember anything because of repressed memories which the both accusers suddenly remembered at the same time when needing money? Who the heck realizes they were abused right after the estate doesn't give you the job of directing the MJ Cirque One show qmd their forst move is to shop a book deal. 🤑. Interesting enough, court transcripts show the judge was told you didn't discuss the abuse with anyone while the judge later found out you spoke about it in hundreds of emails while trying to get a book deal that of course, no one wanted to pick up. Judge also saw the email with the claim it's time for you to get yours $$$$. NL doesn't add up. Honeymoon at EuroDisney before it was even open? Thanksgiving abuse at NL when MJ was in Australia? Your mom danced in 2009 when he died so he couldn't hurt anyone else, but you didn't realize you were abused until years later? And on and on and on....smdh



Yohance Kyles (@HUEYmixwitRILEY)
EditorYohance Kyles (@HUEYmixwitRILE…
New Comment
Yohance Kyles (@HUEYmixwitRILEY)
EditorYohance Kyles (@HUEYmixwitRILE…
New Comment
Yohance Kyles (@HUEYmixwitRILEY)
EditorYohance Kyles (@HUEYmixwitRILE…
Yohance Kyles (@HUEYmixwitRILEY)
EditorYohance Kyles (@HUEYmixwitRILE…
New Comment
1
Yohance Kyles (@HUEYmixwitRILEY)
EditorYohance Kyles (@HUEYmixwitRILE…
New Comment
1
AllHipHop Staff
EditorAllHipHop Staff
New Comment
AllHipHop Staff
EditorAllHipHop Staff
New Comment