Druski Beats Diddy Lawsuit After Judge Reviewed Low Bank Account, Phone Logs

Druski

Druski was cleared in a lawsuit involving Diddy after a judge ruled he was in Georgia during the alleged assault.

Druski walked away from a federal lawsuit accusing him of sexual assault alongside Diddy after a judge ruled there was no evidence placing the comedian in California during the alleged 2018 incident.

Court documents show that bank statements and phone data confirmed Druski was living and working in Georgia at the time.

The judge dismissed the claims against him, citing a complete lack of connection to the location or the other defendants.

The lawsuit, filed by Ashley Parham, accused Druski of pouring baby oil or lubricant on her, then jumping on her naked body “like a slip and slide,” allegedly knocking the wind out of her due to his size.

The complaint also claimed Diddy stood nearby, laughing and filming the encounter on his phone as Parham struggled to retrieve her own device, which had slipped from her hands due to the oil.

The allegations were tied to one of Diddy’s so-called “Freak Off” parties, where federal agents later seized more than 1,000 bottles of baby oil and lubricant from his properties.

Druski’s legal team argued that not only was he never in California during the time of the alleged assault, but he had no relationship with Diddy or the other individuals named in the suit.

At the time, Druski was 23 years old and working as a waiter in Georgia.

Earlier police reports and sworn statements from the plaintiff described her attackers as “thin white men.”

His name only surfaced after the lawsuit gained media traction.

The comedian is now seeking legal sanctions against Parham’s attorneys, calling the case “fabricated” and riddled with inconsistencies.

His legal team is pushing for the court to award attorney’s fees and impose financial penalties on those who filed the complaint.

A hearing is scheduled for July 8 to determine whether the accuser and her lawyers will face sanctions.