Diddy was accused of having a fixation with male ejaculate and orchestrating drug-fueled group sex encounters during explosive testimony Friday (June 6)..

A woman identified only as “Jane” took the stand on Day 18 of the proceedings, describing multiple hotel encounters where she said Diddy pressured her to engage in sex acts with other men while he watched or later joined in.

She testified that Diddy insisted the men not use condoms, saying he didn’t want to “see a rubber” and preferred to “play around with it.”

The testimony painted a disturbing picture of control, coercion and humiliation.

Jane said she was often under the influence of drugs during these encounters and feared Diddy’s.reaction if she refused. “He’d get agitated,” she told the court when asked why she didn’t say no.

The alleged incidents took place in luxury hotels across Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Las Vegas and Beverly Hills. Jane said Diddy paid for the travel, rooms and participants, and that she felt emotionally and financially trapped.

When asked how these encounters ended, Jane testified the men would “finish on me,” followed by Diddy having sex with her.

She said she never cleaned up the ejaculate because Diddy liked to play with it.

Prosecutors pressed Jane on whether she ever tried to negotiate condom use.

She said she did, including one instance that was recorded, but Diddy guilt-tripped her out of it. “It was not something he wanted to see,” she said.

Jane also described the emotional toll of the relationship, saying she felt like she had to “get free” from Diddy’s control.

Diddy, a longtime Hip-Hop mogul and entrepreneur, is facing federal charges of sex trafficking, racketeering and coercion.

Prosecutors allege he used his wealth and status to manipulate women into sexual situations, often involving drugs and third parties.

Diddy’s lawyers drove a “battering ram through the door” to expert testimony, federal prosecutors have told Judge Arun Subramanian, after his defense team questioned a key accuser’s emotional ties to the Hip-Hop mogul during cross-examination.

Prosecutors are now asking Judge Arun Subramanian to allow psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes to return to the witness stand to explain what they call “misleading and prejudicial” claims made by Diddy’s legal team.

The government says Hughes’ testimony is essential to help jurors understand why a sexual abuse victim might still express affection or loyalty toward their alleged abuser after diddy’s assistant using the pseudonym “Mia,” testified and made a series of startling statements.

“After strenuously objecting to any expert testimony on these issues, the defense’s cross examination of Mia drove a battering ram through the door to additional testimony from Dr. Hughes to provide necessary context to its misleading and prejudicial assertions,” U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton wrote in a court filing.

During cross-examination, Diddy’s attorneys repeatedly highlighted messages, social media posts and even a scrapbook that Mia made for Diddy.

They suggested her behavior contradicted her claims of abuse.

The defense asked pointed questions like, “Why would you make a scrapbook for Mr. Combs?” and “How were you best friends with someone who abused you?”

Prosecutors say this strategy wrongly implies that real victims wouldn’t maintain contact or show affection toward their abuser.

They argue that Hughes should be allowed to explain how trauma bonding, emotional manipulation and fear can lead victims to act in ways that may seem contradictory.

“Throughout its cross-examination, the defense asserted time and again that Mia’s actions—such as sending loving messages to the defendant and describing positive moments in their relationship—were inconsistent with her testimony about being sexually abused by the defendant,” Clayton said. “The defense expressly and impliedly stated that someone who was a victim of sexual abuse would not have engaged in such behavior, thereby impugning Mia’s credibility before the jury.”

The government says Hughes would offer limited testimony focused on four areas: definitions of emotional and sexual abuse, how abuse is used to control victims, the emotional effects of abuse and how affection is often used to create psychological dependency.

The court had previously restricted Hughes’ testimony, but prosecutors argue that the defense’s line of questioning has now made her insights necessary to ensure the jury receives a fair and complete picture of the alleged victim’s experience.

Expert testimony in abuse cases has become more common and Hughes has testified in blockbuster trials involving Johnny Depp and Amber Heard, Harvey Weinstein and R Kelly.

The judge has not yet ruled on whether Hughes will be allowed to testify again.